-
Disputation on the Power and Efficacy
of Indulgences Commonly Known as the 95 Theses
-
By Dr. Martin Luther
-
Out of love and concern for the truth,
and with the object of eliciting it, the following heads will be the
subject of a public discussion at Wittenberg under the presidency of
the reverend father, Martin Luther, Augustinian, Master of Arts and
Sacred Theology, and duly appointed Lecturer on these subjects in
that place. He requests that whoever cannot be present personally to
debate the matter orally will do so in absence in writing.
-
1. When our Lord and Master, Jesus
Christ, said "Repent", He called for the entire life of believers
to be one of penitence.
- 2. The word cannot be properly
understood as referring to the sacrament of penance, i.e.
confession and satisfaction, as administered by the clergy.
-
- 3. Yet its meaning is not restricted
to penitence in one's heart; for such penitence is null unless it
produces outward signs in various mortifications of the flesh.
-
- 4. As long as hatred of self abides
(i.e. true inward penitence) the penalty of sin abides, viz.,
until we enter the kingdom of heaven.
-
- 5. The pope has neither the will nor
the power to remit any penalties beyond those imposed either at
his own discretion or by canon law.
-
- 6. The pope himself cannot remit
guilt, but only declare and confirm that, it has been remitted by
God; or, at most, he can remit it in cases reserved to his
discretion. Except for these cases, the guilt remains untouched.
-
- 7. God never remits guilt to anyone
without at the same time, making humbly submissive to the priest,
His representative.
-
- 8. The penitential canons apply only
to men who are still alive, and, according to the canons
themselves, none applies to the dead.
-
- 9. Accordingly, the Holy Spirit,
acting in the person of the pope, manifests grace to us by the
fact that the papal regulations always cease to apply at death, or
in any hard case.
-
- 10. It is a wrongful act, due to
ignorance, when priests retain the canonical penalties on the
dead, in purgatory.
-
- 11. When canonical penalties were
changed and made to apply to purgatory, surely it would seem that
tares were sown while the bishops were asleep.
-
- 12. In former days, the canonical
penalties were imposed, not after, but before absolution was
pronounced; and were intended to be tests of true contrition.
-
- 13. Death puts an end to all the
claims of the Church; even the dying are already dead to the canon
laws, and are no longer bound by them.
-
- 14. Defective piety or love in a
dying person is necessarily accompanied by great fear, which is
greatest where the piety or love is least.
-
- 15. This fear or horror is sufficient
in itself, whatever else might be said, to constitute the pain of
purgatory, since it approaches very closely to the horror of
despair.
-
- 16. There seems to be the same
difference between hell, purgatory, and heaven as between despair,
uncertainty, and assurance.
-
- 17. Of a truth, the pains of souls in
purgatory ought to be abated, and charity ought to be
proportionately increased.
-
- 18. Moreover, it does not seem
proved, on any grounds of reason, or Scripture, that these souls
are outside the state of merit, or unable to grow in grace.
-
- 19. Nor does it seem proved to be
always the case that they are certain and assured of salvation,
even if we are very certain ourselves.
-
- 20. Therefore the pope, in speaking
of the plenary remission of all penalties, does not mean "all" in
the strict sense, but only those imposed by himself.
-
- 21. Hence those who preach
indulgences are in error when they say that a man is absolved and
saved from every penalty by the pope's indulgences;
-
- 22. Indeed, he cannot remit to souls
in purgatory any penalty which canon law declares should be
suffered in the present life.
-
- 23. If plenary remission could be
granted to anyone at all, it would be only in the cases of the
most perfect, i.e. to very few.
-
- 24. It must therefore be the case
that the major part of the people, are deceived by that
indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of relief from penalty.
-
- 25. The same power as the pope
exercises in general over purgatory is exercised in particular by
every single bishop in his bishopric and priest in his parish.
-
- 26. The pope does excellently when he
grants remission to the souls in purgatory on account of
intercessions made on their behalf, and not by the power of the
keys (which he cannot exercise for them).
-
- 27. There is no divine authority for
preaching that the soul flies out of the purgatory immediately the
money clinks in the bottom of the chest.
-
- 28. It is certainly possible that
when the money clinks in the bottom of the chest avarice and greed
increase; but when the church offers intercession, all depends in
the will of God.
-
- 29. Who knows whether all souls in
purgatory wish to be redeemed in view of what is said of St.
Severinus and St. Pascal? (Note: Paschal I, pope 817-24. The
legend is that he and Severinus were willing to endure the pains
of purgatory for the benefit of the faithful).
-
- 30. No one is sure if the reality of
his own contrition, much less of receiving plenary forgiveness.
-
- 31. One who - bona fide - buys
indulgence is as rare as a - bona fide - penitent man, i.e. very
rare indeed.
-
- 32. All those who believe themselves
certain of their own salvation by means of letters of indulgence,
will be eternally damned, together with their teachers.
-
- 33. We should be most carefully on
our guard against those who say that the papal indulgences are an
inestimable divine gift, and that a man, is reconciled to God by
them.
-
- 34. For the grace conveyed by these
indulgences relates simply to the penalties of the sacramental
"satisfactions" decreed merely by man.
-
- 35. It is not in accordance with
Christian doctrines to preach and teach that those who buy off
souls, or purchase confessional licenses, have no need to repent
of their own sins.
-
- 36. Any Christian whatsoever, who is
truly repentant, enjoys plenary remission from penalty and guilt,
and this is given him without letters of indulgence.
-
- 37. Any true Christian whatsoever,
living or dead, participates in all the benefits of Christ and the
Church; and this participation, is granted to him by God without
letters of indulgence.
-
- 38. Yet the pope's remission and
dispensation are in no way to be despised, for as already said,
they proclaim the divine remission.
-
- 39. It is very difficult, even for
the most learned theologians, to extol to the people the great
bounty contained in the indulgences, while, at the same time,
praising contrition as a virtue.
-
- 40. A truly contrite sinner seeks
out, and loves to pay, the penalties of his sins; whereas the very
multitude of indulgences dulls men's consciences, and tends to
make them hate the penalties.
-
- 41. Papal indulgences should only be
preached with caution, lest people gain a wrong understanding, and
think that they are preferable to other good works: those of love.
-
- 42. Christians should be taught that
the pope does not at all intend that the purchase of indulgences
should be understood as at all comparable with the works of mercy.
-
- 43. Christians should be taught that
one who gives to the poor, or lends to the needy, does a better
action than if he purchases indulgences.
-
- 44. Because, by works of love, love
grows, and a man becomes a better man; whereas, by indulgences, he
does not become a better man, but only escapes certain penalties.
-
- 45. Christians should be taught that
he who sees a needy person, but passes him by although he gives
money for indulgences, gains no benefit from the pope's pardon,
but only incurs the wrath of God.
-
- 46. Christians should be taught that,
unless they have more than they need, they are bound to retain
what is only necessary for the upkeep of their home, and should in
no way squander it on indulgences.
-
- 47. Christians should be taught that
they purchase indulgences voluntarily, and are not under
obligation to do so.
-
- 48. Christians should be taught that,
in granting indulgences, the pope has more need, and more desire,
for devout prayer on his own behalf than for ready money.
-
- 49. Christians should be taught that
the pope's indulgences are useful only if one does not rely on
them, but most harmful if one loses the fear of God through them.
-
- 50. Christians should be taught that,
if the pope knew the exactions of the indulgence-preachers, he
would rather the church of St. Peter were reduced to ashes than be
built with the skin, flesh, and bones of the sheep.
-
- 51. Christians should be taught that
the pope would be willing, as he ought if necessity should arise,
to sell the church of St. Peter, and give too, his own money to
many of those whom the pardon-merchants conjure money.
-
- 52. It is vain to rely on salvation
by letters if indulgence, even if the commissary, or indeed the
pope himself, were to pledge his own soul for their validity.
-
- 53. Those are enemies of Christ and
the pope who forbid the word of God to be preached at all in some
churches, in order that indulgences may be preached in others.
-
- 54. The word of God suffers injury
if, in the same sermon, an equal or longer time is devoted to
indulgences than to that word.
-
- 55. The pope cannot help taking the
view that if indulgences (very small matters) are celebrated by
one bell, one pageant, or one ceremony, the gospel (a very great
matter) should be preached to the accompaniment of a hundred
bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.
-
- 56. The treasures of the church, out
of which the pope dispenses indulgences, are not sufficiently
spoken of or known among the people of Christ.
-
- 57. That these treasures are note
temporal are clear from the fact that many of the merchants do not
grant them freely, but only collect them.
-
- 58. Nor are they the merits of Christ
and the saints, because, even apart from the pope, these merits
are always working grace in the inner man, and working the cross,
death, and hell in the outer man.
-
- 59. St. Laurence said that the poor
were the treasures of the church, but he used the term in
accordance with the custom of his own time.
-
- 60. We do not speak rashly in saying
that the treasures of the church are the keys of the church, and
are bestowed by the merits of Christ.
-
- 61. For it is clear that the power of
the pope suffices, by itself, for the remission of penalties and
reserved cases.
-
- 62. The true treasure of the church
is the Holy gospel of the glory and the grace of God.
-
- 63. It is right to regard this
treasure as most odious, for it makes the first to be the last.
-
- 64. On the other hand, the treasure
of indulgences is most acceptable, for it makes the last to be the
first.
-
- 65. Therefore the treasures of the
gospel are nets which, in former times, they used to fish for men
of wealth.
-
- 66. The treasures of the indulgences
are the nets today which they use to fish for men of wealth.
-
- 67. The indulgences, which the
merchants extol as the greatest of favors, are seen to be, in
fact, a favorite means for money-getting.
-
- 68. Nevertheless, they are not to be
compared with the grace of God and the compassion shown in the
Cross.
-
- 69. Bishops and curates, in duty
bound, must receive the commissaries of the papal indulgences with
all reverence;
-
- 70. But they are under a much greater
obligation to watch closely and attend carefully lest these men
preach their own fancies instead of what the pope commissioned.
-
- 71. Let him be anathema and accursed
who denies the apostolic character of the indulgences.
-
- 72. On the other hand, let him be
blessed who is on his guard against the wantonness and license of
the pardon-merchant's words.
-
- 73. In the same way, the pope rightly
excommunicates those who make any plans to the detriment of the
trade in indulgences.
-
- 74. It is much more in keeping with
his views to excommunicate those who use the pretext of
indulgences to plot anything to the detriment of holy love and
truth.
-
- 75. It is foolish to think that papal
indulgences have so much power that they can absolve a man even if
he has done the impossible and violated the mother of God.
-
- 76. We assert the contrary, and say
that the pope's pardons are not able to remove the least venial of
sins as far as their guilt is concerned.
-
- 77. When it is said that not even St.
Peter, if he were now pope, could grant a greater grace, it is
blasphemy against St. Peter and the pope.
-
- 78. We assert the contrary, and say
that he, and any pope whatever, possesses greater graces, viz.,
the gospel, spiritual powers, gifts of healing, etc., as is
declared in I Corinthians 12 [:28].
-
- 79. It is blasphemy to say that the
insignia of the cross with the papal arms are of equal value to
the cross on which Christ died.
-
- 80. The bishops, curates, and
theologians, who permit assertions of that kind to be made to the
people without let or hindrance, will have to answer for it.
-
- 81. This unbridled preaching of
indulgences makes it difficult for learned men to guard the
respect due to the pope against false accusations, or at least
from the keen criticisms of the laity;
-
- 82. They ask, e.g.: Why does not the
pope liberate everyone from purgatory for the sake of love (a most
holy thing) and because of the supreme necessity of their souls?
This would be morally the best of all reasons. Meanwhile he
redeems innumerable souls for money, a most perishable thing, with
which to build St. Peter's church, a very minor purpose.
-
- 83. Again: Why should funeral and
anniversary masses for the dead continue to be said? And why does
not the pope repay, or permit to be repaid, the benefactions
instituted for these purposes, since it is wrong to pray for those
souls who are now redeemed?
-
- 84. Again: Surely this is a new sort
of compassion, on the part of God and the pope, when an impious
man, an enemy of God, is allowed to pay money to redeem a devout
soul, a friend of God; while yet that devout and beloved soul is
not allowed to be redeemed without payment, for love's sake, and
just because of its need of redemption.
-
- 85. Again: Why are the penitential
canon laws, which in fact, if not in practice, have long been
obsolete and dead in themselves, why are they, today, still used
in imposing fines in money, through the granting of indulgences,
as if all the penitential canons were fully operative?
-
- 86. Again: since the pope's income
today is larger than that of the wealthiest of wealthy men, why
does he not build this one church of St. Peter with his own money,
rather than with the money of indigent believers?
-
- 87. Again: What does the pope remit
or dispense to people who, by their perfect penitence, have a
right to plenary remission or dispensation?
-
- 88. Again: Surely a greater good
could be done to the church if the pope were to bestow these
remissions and dispensations, not once, as now, but a hundred
times a day, for the benefit of any believer whatever.
-
- 89. What the pope seeks by
indulgences is not money, but rather the salvation of souls; why
then does he not suspend the letters and indulgences formerly
conceded, and still as efficacious as ever?
-
- 90. These questions are serious
matters of conscience to the laity. To suppress them by force
alone, and not to refute them by giving reasons, is to expose the
church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies, and to make
Christian people unhappy.
-
- 91. If therefore, indulgences were
preached in accordance with the spirit and mind of the pope, all
these difficulties would be easily overcome, and indeed, cease to
exist.
-
- 92. Away, then, with those prophets
who say to Christ's people, "Peace, peace," where in there is no
peace.
-
- 93. Hail, hail to all those prophets
who say to Christ's people, "The cross, the cross," where there is
no cross.
-
- 94. Christians should be exhorted to
be zealous to follow Christ, their Head, through penalties,
deaths, and hells;
-
- 95. And let them thus be more
confident of entering heaven through many tribulations rather than
through a false assurance of peace.
|